바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

The Collapse of the Flying Geese Development Model: Advent of New Order in East Asia and a Foreign Policy Alternative for the Republic of Korea

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2009, v.12 no.4, pp.155-180
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2009.12.4.006
Phillip H. Park
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

As of 2009, the economic, security and diplomatic circumstances on and around the Korean Peninsula are highly complex and dynamic. While the US, whose economy was cast into tumult by the recent financial crisis, tries to maintain its military hegemony in Northeast Asia, Japan, whose status as the economic leader of East Asia is threatened by China’s recent economic rise, aims to become a “normal nation.” This push by Japan will likely trigger an arms race in Northeast Asia, which in turn will raise tensions between China and Japan. The US-Korea alliance is the pivot of South Korea’s foreign policy. However, strengthening the alliance inevitably forces South Korea to choose a side in the power play between China and Japan in Northeast Asia, adding to the tensions between the two countries. Furthermore, such a policy would not serve Korea’s best interests. Rather than an alliance, neutrality is an appropriate foreign policy for Korea and it is high time we consider neutrality as a viable alternative.

keywords
Greater East Asia co-Prosperity Sphere, Flying Geese Model, alliance, neutrality

Reference

1.

Bank of Korea. 2006. “Foreign Economic Data year 2006-number 92.” Seoul: Bank of Korea, October 30.

2.

Beasly, W. G. 1987. Japanese Imperialism 1894-1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

3.

Burkett, Paul and Martin Hart-Lansberg. Development, Crisis and Class Struggle: Learning from Japan and East Asia. London: Macmillan Press, 2003.

4.

Chang, Ha-joon. 2004 Kicking Away the Ladder (Korean version). Seoul: Booki.

5.

Chung, Jae-ho. 2000. “Jungguk ui Busang, Miguk ui Gyeongjae, Hanguk ui dilema (Rise of China, Balancing of America, and Korea’s Dilemma): ShinDong-A, October.

6.

CIA World Factbook 2008. CIA. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld- factbook/geos/ja.html (accessed March 17, 2009).

7.

Cumings, Bruce. 1990. The Origin of the Korean War, Volume II. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

8.

Donner, Richard F. 1993. “Japanese Foreign Investment and the Creation of a Pacific Asian Region,” in Jeffrey A. Frankel and Miles Kahler, eds., Regionalism and Rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

9.

Doss, Veda. 1996. “Japan’s development aid: Self-interest or economic partnership?” International Advances in Economic Research, Vol. 2, Number 3, August.

10.

Gordon, Andrew. 2003. A Modern History of Japan. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Ha, Young-sun ed. 1998. Hanguk gwa Ilbon (Korea and Japan). Seoul: Nanam.

12.

Han, Suk-hee. 2009. “Yi Myung Bak Jeongbu ui Dajungguk Gwanggye” (The Lee Myung Bak government’s China policy). Korea Institute for Future Strategies: http://www.kifs.org/contents/sub3/issue.php?method=info&sId=2082 (accessed October 2, 2009).

13.

Hart-Landsberg, Marty. 1998. Korea. New York: Monthly Review Press.

14.

Halliday, Jon and Gavan McCormack. 1973. Japanese Imperialism Today New York: Monthly Review Press.

15.

Hausner, Jerry, Bob Jessop, and Klaus Neilson eds. 1995. Strategic Choice and Path- Dependency in Post-Socialism: Institutional Dynamics in the Transformation Process. Aldershot UK: Edward Elgar.

16.

Hoadley, Stephen and Jian Yang. 2007. “China’s Cross-Regional FTA Initiatives: Towards Comprehensive National Power” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 2, summer.

17.

International Institute for Strategic Studies. 2007. http://www.iiss.org.uk/whatsnew/ iiss-in-the-press/press-coverage-2007/june-2007/chinas-military-mustbe- more-transparent/ (accessed January 28, 2009).

18.

Ishikawa Masumi. 2006. Ilbon jeonhu jeongchisa (The Post-War Political History of Japan). Seoul: Humanitas.

19.

JoongAng Daily. 2007. “Bleak times lie ahead”, Joong-ang Daily Newspaper [internet] (March 12). http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2873300 (accessed January 29, 2009).

20.

Kang, Jae-eon. 2005. Joseon-tongsinsa ui Ilbon Gyeonmunrok (A Report of Chosun’s scholars who dispatch to Japan). Seoul: Hankilsa.

21.

Kasahara, Shigehisa. 2004. “The Flying Geese Paradigm: A critical study of its application to East Asian regional development” discussion paper No. 169, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

22.

Kilman, Daniel M. 2006. Japan’s Security Strategy in the Post-9/11 World. Westport, London: Praeger Publisher.

23.

Kim, Key-Hiuk. 1980. The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.

24.

Kolko, Joyce and Gabriel Kolko. 1972. The Politics of War: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1943-1945. New York: Random House.

25.

Kosaka, Masataka. 1989. “Nihon Gaiko no Bensho.” In Tadashi Aruga et al., eds. Koza Kokusai Seiji, Vol. 4: Nihon no Gaiko. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.

26.

Kosuke Takahashi. “Japan to Become Britain of the Far East,” Asia Times, February 24.

27.

Li Xiaohua. 2006. “S. Korean Students in China Number 54,000,” china.org.cn, November 22: http://www.china.org.cn/english/LivinginChina/189809.htm

28.

Lincoln, Edward J. 1993. Japan’s New Global Role. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

29.

Magnier, Mark and Murphy, Kim. 2005. “An Exercise Fit for Sending U.S. a Message”, LA Times [Internet], August 17: http://articles.latimes.com/2005/ aug/17/world/fg- exercise17 (accessed May 11, 2009).

30.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2009. http://www.fta.go.kr/user/fta_korea/ Overall_list.asp?country_idx=23 (accessed March 19, 2009)

31.

Nam, Ki-jung. “Ilbon ui Umjikim ul Jooui Haja” (Be aware of Japan), JoongAng Daily August 03.

32.

Observing Japan. 2009. “Constitution revision back on the agenda?” April 03: http:// www.observingjapan.com/search?q=constitution (accessed June 22, 2009).

33.

Pak, Bum-seon. 2004. “Jungguk ui busaeng gwa Dong-asia ui Hyobryok Byunhwa (Rise of China and Change in Cooperation among East Asian Countries),” in Samsung Economic Research Institute’s Report. Seoul: Samsung Economic Research Institute, September.

34.

Pak, Sae-il. 2006. “Gukga jeolryak uiroseo ui hanmi dongmaeng (The US-ROK FTA as Korea’s National Strategy) Chosun Daily, November 26, p. 3A.

35.

Park, Hu-geon. 2007. Jungriphwa noseon gwa Hanbando ui Mirae (Korean Neutrality and the Future of Korea). Seoul: Sunin.

36.

Pyle, Kenneth B. 1992. The Japanese Question: Power and Purpose in a New Era. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.

37.

Rhee, Syngman. 1912. Neutrality as influenced by the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

38.

Schlesinger, Arthur. 1989. “Our Problem is Not Japan or Germany,” Wall Street Journal December 22, A6.

39.

Smith, Patrick. 2008. Japan: re-interpretation (Korean version). Seoul: Mati.

40.

Speed, Roger and May, Michael. 2005. “Dangerous Doctrine,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 61, No. 2, March/April.

41.

Terry, Edith. 1996. “An East Asian Paradigm?” Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, September.

42.

Thaindian News. 2008. “US-South Korea military alliance ‘Cold War product’: China.”, Thaindian News[internet], May 27: http://www.thaindian.com/ newsportal/world-news/us-south-korea-military-alliance-cold-war-productchina_ 10053466.html (accessed January 28, 2009)

43.

Tsuru, Shigeto. 1993. Japan’s Capitalism: Creative Defeat and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Yi, Ji-pyung, 2006. “Daeilmuyeokjeokja kojilbyeong dachaek eobna? (Trade deficit against Japan, Is there any solution?)” Weekly Dong-A Vol. 518, January, Seoul: DongaA Ilbosa.

45.

Yu, Bin. 2005. “China and Russia: Normalizing Their Strategic Partnership” in Shambaugh, David ed. Power Shift. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

46.

Yukichi Fukuzawa. 1885/1996. “Good-bye Asia (1885)”, David John Lu, ed., Japan: a documentary history: The Late Tokugawa Period to the Present, Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.

The Review of Korean Studies