바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

Effective Use of Information on the Web for Korean History Courses Taught in English

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2010, v.13 no.2, pp.77-94
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2010.13.2.004

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

If information on the Web has appropriate credibility and content to be used for Korean history courses taught in English, we can categorize this information according to two main criteria. If the information takes the form of a written text, we can categorize the text according to the language in which it is written, Korean, English, Chinese, or Japanese being the most common. The most convenient language for our purpose, of course, is English. The other main criterion is the medium by which the information is conveyed. Information will be in the form of text, still images, or moving images. The more convenient forms for our purposes are still and moving images. Combining the two criteria, the most convenient and effective form of information to be used in Korean history courses in English would be visual media in English, followed by visual media in Korean, and English texts, respectively.

keywords
English text, still images, moving images, Korean history in English.

Reference

1.

Bak, Jeong-Gyeong. 2006. Saibeo gongganeseo minyojaryoui jonjaeyangsanggwa haksuljeog hwalyong sigak (Existing patterns of folk songs in cyber space and the viewpoint for academic application). Hankukminyohak 19:163-206.

2.

Jeong, Mi-Ryang, and Tae-Suk Kihl. 2010. Research on the development of a user-oriented Korean history site, Review of Korean Studies 13 (1): 205-229.

3.

Kim, Hye-Jung. 2004. Minyoui jungbohwawa saibeo hangukminyodaegwanui eumaghakjuk hwalyong bangan (The musicological application plan of the informationalization of Korean folk songs and the overall survey on the cyber Korean folk song). Hankukminyohak 14:89-110.

4.

Kim, Ki-Duk. 2000. Jeongbohwa sidaeui yeoksahak (The history of the digital period: The promise of visual history). Yeoksagyoyuk 75:127-153.

5.

Kim, Ki-Duk. 2005. Jeontong yeoksahakui eungyongjeok cheugmyeonui saeroun heureumgwa gwaje (New trends and aspects of applying traditional history to cultural content). Yeoksawahyensil 58:369-389.

6.

Kim, Ki-Duk. 2008. Yeongsang yeoksahak (Visual history: enlargement of the role of history and its new responsibilities). Yeoksahakbo 200:99-127.

7.

Lee, Nam-Hee. 2000. Joseonsidae jaryoui jeonsanhwa (Digitalization of resources of the Joseon dynasty). Joseonsidaesahakbo 12:153-180.

8.

Lee, Nam-Hee. 2006. Munhwa contencheuui infeura guchuk hyeonhwanggwa hwalyonge daehayeo (The present stage and use of the digitalization of Korean cultural and historical materials). Oneuluidongyangsasang 14:263-284.

9.

Lee, Nam-Hee. 2008. Saenghwalsa akaiveu guchukeul wihan munseo jaryui jojik (The organization of old documents for the lifestyle history archives). Yeongnamhak 14:63-100.

10.

Lee, Sun-Kyung. 2003. Yuamisul gamsangjaryo hwalyongeul wihan inteonet websait hyeonhwang josa (Research of internet Web sites for young children’s art appreciation data). Eorinimidieoyeongu 2:163-183.

The Review of Korean Studies