바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2011, v.14 no.1, pp.35-55
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2011.14.1.002

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The official state ideology of the Joseon dynasty (1392-1910) was Confucianism. But many Joseon kings who held convictions about Confucian values as precepts for state management also held personal Buddhist beliefs. The Joseon kings’ Buddhist beliefs and practices were strongly criticized by the Confucian scholar-officials as undesirable behaviors for leaders of a Confucian state. Despite of these criticisms, the Joseon kings did not give up their Buddhist beliefs. My paper consists of three parts. First, I explain the Joseon kings’ theoretical defense of Buddhism and the cases of Joseon kings’ personal Buddhist beliefs and practices. Second, I focus on the sources of the Joseon kings’ political authority and Buddhism as a source of legitimacy. Third, I explain the flexible and realistic policies on Buddhism, the Kings’ amicable response to Buddhism, and the efficiency of kingship through the political use of Buddhism. Confucianism was regarded as the only source of a king’s political authority in a Confucian state. But the fact that many Joseon people believed in Buddhism could not be ignored. Buddhism also could be a useful element to increase the people’s religious and political ties to kings who believed in Buddhism. I think that the Joseon kings knew this fact and used it politically. Confucianism was the dominant element of the kings’ political authority and the sources of the legitimacy of Joseon Dynasty. But the kings’ Buddhist beliefs and amicable policies to Buddhism have political significance in that they contributed to the formation of people’ s friendly feelings toward the kings and the integration of national unity.

keywords
Joseon Kings’ Buddhist Belief. Joseon Kings’ Political authority, Joseon Kings’ Political legitimacy. Political stability

Reference

1.

Buswell, Robert E. 1999. Buddhism under Confucian Domination: The Synthetic Vision of Sosŏn Hyujŏng. Haboush, JaHyun Kim and Martina Deuchler eds. Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

2.

Culture/tourism. http://www.namhae.go.kr.

3.

Duncan, John B. 1999. The Origins of the Chosŏn Dynasty. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

4.

Geum, Jang-tae. 2003. Yugyoui jonggyoseonggwa yugyo: Cheongjugyoui gyolyu (The Religiosity of Confucianism and the Interchange between Confucianism and Catholicism). Jonggyowa munhwa (Religion and Culture) 9:1-37.

5.

Gkwak, Je-u. Mang-u Jip 忘憂集. In Hankuk Munjip Chong-gan. Vol. 58.

6.

Hanguk bulgyo jeonseo (Complete Works of Korean Buddhism 韓國佛敎全書). 1979. Volumes 1-14. Seoul: Dongkuk University Press.

7.

Hanguk Munjip Chong-gan 韓國文集叢刊 (Collections of the Pre-modern Korean Scholars’ Writings). 2004. Seoul: Institute for the Translation of Korean Classics Press.

8.

Heo Mok. Gi-eon 記言. In Hanguk Munjip Chong-gan. Vol. 99.

9.

Jeong, Do-Jeon. 1961. The Miscellaneous Excuses of Buddhism. Sambong Jip 三峯集. Seoul: National Institute of Korean History re-published edition.

10.

Joseon wangjo sillok (The Annals of the Joseon Dynasty朝鮮王朝實錄), http://sillok.history.go.kr

11.

Kalton, Michael. 1985. The Writings of Kwon Kun: The Context and Shape of Early Yi Dynasty Neo-Confucianism. In The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea, eds. Wm. Theodore de Bary and JaHyun Kim Haboush, 89-123. New York: Columbia University Press.

12.

Kim, Jongmyung. 2010. Sejongui bulgyogwangwa yugyojeonchi (King Sejong’s Buddhist View and Confucian Statecraft). Bulgyohak yeongu (Journal of Buddhist Studies) 25:239-82.

13.

Kim, Sang-Hyun. 2010. Munjeongwanghuui bulgyo jungheungjeongcheak (Buddhist Restoration Polices of the Queen Mungjeong). Hanguk bulgyohak (The Journal of Korean Association for Buddhist Studies) 56:25-52.

14.

Kim, Su-on. Sig-u Jip 栻疣集. In Hankuk Munjip Chong-gan.

15.

Koh, He-ryeong, 2006. Mokeunjip eul tonghaebon isaekui bulgyowaui gwangye (Relationship of YiSaek with Buddhism Analysed through Mogeunjip). Jindan hakbo 102:351-86.

16.

Nam, Hee Suk. 2002. Joseonhugi wangsilui bulgyosinanggwa bulseoganhaeng (The Buddhist Beliefs of the Royal Family and the Publications of Buddhist Scriptures in Late Joseon), Guksagwan nonchong 99:47-78.

17.

Pu, Nam Chul. 2005. Buddhism and Confucianism in King Sejong’s State Administration: Tension and Unity between Religion and Politics. The Review of Korean Studies 8(3):25-45.

18.

Pu, Nam Chul, 2003. Yugyojeok hakjagunju jeongjoui jonggyojeongchaek (Confucian Scholar-king Jeongjo (r.1776-1800): His policy on religion). Hanguk jeongchi hakhoebo (Korean Political Science Review) 37(2):47-65.

19.

Sim, Jae-ryong. 1999. Korean Buddhism: Tradition and Transformation. Seoul: Jimoondang.

20.

Yi, Hang-ro. Whaseo Jip 華西集. In Hankuk Munjip Chong-gan. Vol. 304.

21.

Yi, Sang-baek. 1984. Hanguk munhwasa nongo. Seoul: Eulyu munwhasa.

22.

You, Byung-Rae. 2006. Joseonjo Sogyeokjeonui yeonwongwa teoe gwanhan gochal (A Study on the Origin of Joseon Dynasty’s Sogyeokjeon and its Site). Hanguk sasanggwa munhwa (Korean Thoughts and Culture) 32:127-73.

23.

Yu, Seong-Ryeong. Seo-Ae Jip 西厓集. In Hankuk Munjip Chong Gan. Vol. 52.

The Review of Korean Studies