바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

The Invention of the Other, Ethics, and the Question of “Geopolitical Unconscious” in Contemporary Korean Films: Silmido, TaeGukGi: Brotherhood of War, and Shiri

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2015, v.18 no.1, pp.127-151
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2015.18.1.006

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

By analysing Silmido (2003), TaeGukGi: Brotherhood of War (2004) and, finally, Shiri (1998), this paper discusses how each film works to respond to an encounter with the traumatic Other. The representation of the Other necessarily leads us to raise the issue of ethics. The term “ethics” here refers precisely to “ethics of the Real” (Zupančič 2000) in which the subject redefines the mode of being in this encounter with the traumatic Real, thus becoming a true subject. One of the prevailing tropes of contemporary Korean film is the way in which the protagonist’s suicide keeps utopian impulses permanently parenthesised through the logic of sacrifice. Silmido and TaeGukGi demonstrate this. In contrast, Shiri opens up the inherent contradictions of all such ideas by revealing that the female protagonist maintains fidelity towards her own “acts” without being drawn into the logic of sacrifice. In so doing, this film enables us to cognitively map out the “geopolitical unconscious” of South Korea, i.e., the unrepresentable totality of the current South Korean capitalist system.

keywords
Silmido, TaeGukGi, Shiri, Other, ethics of the Real, geopolitical unconscious

Reference

1.

Aaron, Michele. 2007. Spectatorship: The Power of Looking On. London and New York: Wallflower.

2.

Badiou, Alain. 2001. Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Translated by Peter Hallward. London and New York: Verso.

3.

Baek, Moonim. 2006. “Choegeun Hangukyeonghwaui Trauma Sangtae: Technology-wa Wonhan” [The Traumatic Status of Contemporary Korean Cinema: Technology and Resentment]. In Korean Cinema’s Aesthetics and Historical Imagination, edited by Yonsei Universitiy Media Art Centre, 75-92. Seoul: Sodo.

4.

Dalton, Bronwen, and James Cotton. 1996. “New Social Movements and the Changing Nature of Political Opposition in South Korea.” In Political oppositions in industrialising Asia, edited by Garry Rodan, 221-43. London and New York: Routledge.

5.

Diffrient, David Scott. 2000. “Seoul as Cinematic Cityscpae: Shiri and the Politico-Aethetics of Invisiblity.” Asian Cinema 11 (2): 76-91.

6.

Downing, Lisa, and Libby Saxton. 2010. Film and Ethics: Foreclosed Encounters. London and New York: Routledge.

7.

Evans, Dylan. 1996. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.

8.

Ha, Seung-woo. 2013. “post-chungchi sidae, Hangukyeonghwaui jaenankwa kongpoeu kwanhan sangsangryuk” [In the Era of Post-Politics, Contemporary Korean Cinema’s Imagination on Disaster and Fear]. Journal of Lacan & Contemporary Psychoanalysiss 15 (2): 81-101.

9.

Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

10.

Jameson, Fredric. 1992. The Geopolitical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in the World System. London: BFI Publishing.

11.

Lacan, Jacques. 1988. The Seminar of Jacque Lacan: Book I, Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953-54. Translated by John Forrester. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh and Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press.

13.

Myers, Tony. 2003. Slavoj Žižek. London and New York: Routledge.

14.

Reinhard, Kenneth. 2005. “Toward a Political Theology of the Neighbor.” In The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology, 11-75. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Schmitt, Carl. 1996. The Concept of the Political. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Žižek, Slavoj. 1991. Enjoy Your Symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. New York and London: Routledge.

17.

Žižek, Slavoj. 1992. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London: The MIT Press.

18.

Žižek, Slavoj. 1997. The Plague of Fantasies. London and New York: Verso.

19.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2002. Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?: Five Interventions in the (Mis) Use of a Notion. London and New York: Verso.

20.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2004. Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle. London and New York: Verso.

21.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2005a. “Neighbors and Other Monsters: A Plea for Ethical Violence.” In The Neighbor: Three Inquiries in Political Theology, 134-90. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2005b. “Re-visioning ‘Lacanian’ Social Criticism: The Law and Its Obscene Double.” In Interrogating the Real, edited by Rex Butler and Scott Stephens, 285-306. London and New York: Continuum.

23.

Žižek, Slavoj. 2006. How to Read Lacan. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.

24.

Zupančič, Alenka. 2000. Ethics of the Real: Kant, Lacan. London and New York: Verso.

25.

Zylinska, Joanna. 2005. The Ethics of Cultural Studies. London and New York: Continuum.

The Review of Korean Studies