바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Review of Korean Studies

Aspects of Korean Folk Daoism in the 19th century

The Review of Korean Studies / The Review of Korean Studies, (P)1229-0076; (E)2773-9351
2018, v.21 no.1, pp.125-140
https://doi.org/10.25024/review.2018.21.1.005

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This article examines how the Korean Daoism of the 19th century developed from three religious organizations: Three key elements will be examined in this study: the expansion of the worship of Guanwoo, the importance of gangpil and gameung, and the publication of Daoist books through the religious organization Musangdan. This article will firstly examine how Guanwoo belief was systemized by the Joseon government and show its prevalence in the 19th century. It will secondly call attention to the importance of gangpil and gameung. Thirdly, it will look at the publication of a wide range of Daoist scriptures in the Joseon dynasty. In the 20th century, new Korean religions required a heightened racial consciousness and a stronger national identity. Among the new religions, “Daejongyo,” which was active in the resistance movement against Japan in Manchuria during the period of Japanese colonial rule, is a representative example. New religions, namely, ethno-national faiths, made Guanwoo the major God and actively accepted the use of spells and talismans. These characteristics imply that new religions should receive attention as a continuation of folk Daoism in the late Joseon dynasty (1392-1910), and not as a new type of religion which suddenly appeared. The origins of new religions in the latter era of the Joseon dynasty can be found in folk Daoism. They then continued to develop over the latter part of the Joseon dynasty and the early 20th century, while their folk Daoist heritage also continued to exert a great effect on the ideological and ritualistic composition of each new religion.

keywords
folk Daoism, Confucianism, Buddhism, Guanwoo belief, Seoneumjeulgyo, Musangdan, Joseon dynasty

Reference

1.

Bishop, Isabella L. Bird. 1898. Korea and Her Neighbors: A Narrative of Travel, with an Account of the Recent Vicissitudes and Present Position of the Country. London: John Murray.

2.

Kim, Youngyeong. 2013. “The Duality of Citing Zhu Xi in the Annotations of the Daodejing during the Joseon Dynasty.” Korea Journal 53 (3): 29-47.

3.

Kim,Yunsoo. 2008. “Nandan Daoism in Gojong Period.” Dongyang cheolhak [The East Philosophy] 30: 57-102.

4.

Lee, Neunghwa. 2000. Chosun [The History of Joseon Daoism]. Seoul:Boseongmunwhasa.

5.

Lee, Sangho, ed. 1929. Daesunjeongyeong 大巡典經 [Daesun Scripture]. Seoul:Sangsaengsa.

6.

Park, Noja. 2004. “Nowadays, We are Going to Resemble Western People who was in 100 years ago.” Presian News, April 2.

7.

Underwood, Lillias H. 1918. Underwood of Korea: Being an Intimate Record of the Life and Work of the Rev. H. G. Underwood, D. D., LL. D., for Thirty One Years a Missionary of the Presbyterian Board in Korea. New York:Fleming H. Revell Co.

8.

Wang, Xingping 王興平. 2002. “The Propagation and Influence of Wenchang’s Culture in the Joseon Dynasty” 文昌文化在朝鲜半岛的传播和影响. Chinese Daoism 中國道敎 3: 40-42.

The Review of Korean Studies